Klika Tech vs EmLogic AS: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Klika Tech (4.1/5) edges ahead of EmLogic AS (4.0/5) overall. Klika Tech is the better choice for IoT firmware designed around an AWS-based cloud backend from the start. EmLogic AS is the stronger option for zephyr RTOS firmware development and migration. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Klika Tech vs EmLogic AS: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Klika Tech | EmLogic AS |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2013 | 2021 |
| HQ | North Miami Beach, FL, USA | Norway |
| Team size | Not published | Not published |
| Rating | 4.1 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | AWS IoT and DevOps competency partner status combined with STMicroelectronics hardware partnership | Founding team with prior embedded-company-building experience concentrated specifically on Zephyr RTOS |
| Pricing model | Project-based IoT and cloud-embedded engagements | Project-based embedded design engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | AWS IoT, C, C++ | Zephyr RTOS, FPGA, C |
| Industries served | Industrial IoT, Consumer IoT, Cloud-connected devices | Industrial, IoT hardware |
Klika Tech vs EmLogic AS: overview
Klika Tech
Klika Tech was founded in 2013 and is headquartered in North Miami Beach, Florida, with delivery centers across North America, Europe, and Asia, including a Wrocław, Poland office opened in 2021. The company builds IoT, cloud, and embedded product solutions together, holding AWS IoT and DevOps competencies alongside STMicroelectronics partner status on the hardware side, positioning itself for clients whose firmware needs to talk directly to an AWS-based backend from day one. That cloud-first framing distinguishes it from firmware vendors that treat cloud integration as an afterthought handled by a separate team.
EmLogic AS
EmLogic AS was founded on January 1, 2021 by Michal Koziel, Snorre Meland, Sven Ivar Mørch, and Espen Tallaksen, each with prior experience founding similar embedded companies, and operates as part of the TechSeed group in Norway. The firm specializes in embedded software, FPGA, and hardware design, with particular depth in Zephyr RTOS, the Linux Foundation-hosted real-time operating system that has become a de facto industry standard for secure, low-power connected devices. Its recency as a company means a shorter public track record than most competitors, offset by founders who each carry prior embedded-industry company-building experience.
Services and capabilities: Klika Tech vs EmLogic AS
| Capability | Klika Tech | EmLogic AS |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bare-metal & driver development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Secure boot / OTA firmware updates | ✗ | ✗ |
| MCU & platform migration | ✗ | ✗ |
| Connectivity & IoT protocols | ✓ | ✗ |
| Functional safety / compliance | ✗ | ✗ |
| Embedded AI / on-device inference | ✓ | ✗ |
| Firmware GUI development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Hardware co-design / board bring-up | ✓ | ✓ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Klika Tech vs EmLogic AS
| Framework / platform | Klika Tech | EmLogic AS |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | N/A | N/A |
| Zephyr | N/A | ✓ |
| STM32 | N/A | N/A |
| ARM Cortex-M | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| MISRA | N/A | N/A |
| Secure Boot | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | ✓ | N/A |
| RISC-V | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Klika Tech vs EmLogic AS
| Criterion | Klika Tech | EmLogic AS |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Project-based IoT and cloud-embedded engineering | Project-based embedded design |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Klika Tech vs EmLogic AS
| Dimension | Klika Tech | EmLogic AS |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Industrial IoT, Consumer IoT, Cloud-connected devices | Industrial, IoT hardware |
| Best use cases | IoT device firmware designed to integrate directly with an AWS IoT backend, Combined cloud and embedded firmware development for a new connected product | Migration of existing firmware from a legacy RTOS to Zephyr, New product firmware built natively on Zephyr RTOS |
| Typical project type | Project-based IoT and cloud-embedded engineering | Project-based embedded design |
Klika Tech vs EmLogic AS: pros and cons
| Klika Tech | |
|---|---|
| + | AWS IoT and DevOps competency status backs its cloud-first firmware positioning with a verifiable AWS partner credential |
| + | STMicroelectronics partner status on the hardware side pairs cloud integration with direct chip-vendor support |
| + | 12 years of operating history with delivery centers spanning North America, Europe, and Asia |
| + | Cloud-and-firmware co-design suits products where the backend and the device firmware are built by the same team from the outset |
| - | Its AWS-centric framing is a narrower fit for firmware projects that need to stay cloud-agnostic or target Azure or GCP instead |
| - | Public team size is not published, making capacity harder to gauge against other mid-size firms |
| - | No published pricing or minimum engagement figure |
| EmLogic AS | |
|---|---|
| + | Zephyr RTOS specialization targets the real-time operating system the Linux Foundation and much of the industry now treat as the de facto standard |
| + | All four founders bring prior experience founding similar embedded companies, not first-time entrepreneurship |
| + | FPGA and hardware design capability alongside firmware covers projects that need custom logic as well as MCU code |
| + | Part of the TechSeed group in Norway, giving it access to a broader company-building network |
| - | Founded in 2021, giving it the shortest public operating history of any company on this list |
| - | Public team size and detailed case study history are not yet published |
| - | No published pricing or minimum engagement figure |
Who should choose Klika Tech?
A typical fit: IoT device firmware designed to integrate directly with an AWS IoT backend.
AWS IoT and DevOps competency partner status combined with STMicroelectronics hardware partnership. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial IoT, Consumer IoT, Cloud-connected devices.
Who should choose EmLogic AS?
A typical fit: migration of existing firmware from a legacy RTOS to Zephyr.
Founding team with prior embedded-company-building experience concentrated specifically on Zephyr RTOS. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial, IoT hardware.
Decision matrix: Klika Tech vs EmLogic AS
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Klika Tech (Not published) vs EmLogic AS (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Klika Tech |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Klika Tech vs EmLogic AS
| Use case | Klika Tech fit | EmLogic AS fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| IoT device firmware designed to integrate directly with an AWS IoT backend | Strong | Limited | Klika Tech |
| Combined cloud and embedded firmware development for a new connected product | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Migration of existing firmware from a legacy RTOS to Zephyr | Limited | Strong | EmLogic AS |
| New product firmware built natively on Zephyr RTOS | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Klika Tech vs EmLogic AS
Klika Tech (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Firmware Development projects. AWS IoT and DevOps competency partner status combined with STMicroelectronics hardware partnership.
EmLogic AS (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need new product firmware built natively on Zephyr RTOS. If your situation matches that, EmLogic AS is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Klika Tech vs EmLogic AS FAQ
Is Klika Tech better than EmLogic AS?
Klika Tech (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Klika Tech's strongest advantage: AWS IoT and DevOps competency status backs its cloud-first firmware positioning with a verifiable AWS partner credential. EmLogic AS's strongest advantage: zephyr RTOS specialization targets the real-time operating system the Linux Foundation and much of the industry now treat as the de facto standard.
How do Klika Tech and EmLogic AS differ in pricing?
Klika Tech uses project-based iot and cloud-embedded engagements pricing. EmLogic AS uses project-based embedded design engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Klika Tech or EmLogic AS?
Klika Tech is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Klika Tech and EmLogic AS?
Klika Tech's primary differentiator is: AWS IoT and DevOps competency partner status combined with STMicroelectronics hardware partnership. EmLogic AS's primary differentiator is: founding team with prior embedded-company-building experience concentrated specifically on Zephyr RTOS. They also differ in team size (Not published vs Not published), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Industrial IoT, Consumer IoT vs Industrial, IoT hardware).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.