Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of Timesys (4.5/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for RTOS and secure-firmware projects needing chip-vendor partnerships. Timesys is the stronger option for embedded Linux build systems and long-term security maintenance. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Timesys |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 1995 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | Pittsburgh, PA, USA |
| Team size | 200+ | Not published |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 4.5 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status combined with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up | Founding Yocto Project member with three decades of embedded Linux build-system and security-maintenance depth |
| Pricing model | Firmware consulting, design-phase engagement, full development lifecycle, or staff augmentation | Support contracts, consultation, and custom development engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | MISRA C, FreeRTOS, Zephyr | Yocto Project, Embedded Linux, Buildroot |
| Industries served | Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging, OCPP), Transportation & Logistics (ISO 26262, IEC 61508), Manufacturing & Industrial IoT (IEC 62443), Consumer Electronics (FCC, CE/RED), Automotive (ISO 26262, ASPICE, ISO/SAE 21434) | Industrial, Networking, Consumer electronics, Automotive |
Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Lemberg Solutions was founded in Lviv in 2007 and has grown to a 200+ person team with additional offices in Hamburg, London, and Kraków. Its firmware practice covers RTOS and bare-metal architecture on FreeRTOS, Zephyr, and Azure RTOS, secure boot and OTA update design, MCU and platform migration, and embedded GUI work in Qt, LVGL, and TouchGFX, backed by direct partnership status with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip. An in-house lab with oscilloscopes, evaluation kits, and hardware-in-the-loop testing lets the team validate board bring-up rather than outsource it. ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications, plus MISRA-aware testing, support regulated healthcare, automotive, and industrial clients, and the company transfers full IP and source code rights to the client on delivery.
Timesys
Timesys was founded in Pittsburgh in 1995 and built its reputation as a founding member of the Yocto Project, one of the two dominant embedded Linux build systems alongside Buildroot. The company's LinuxLink platform and development-support services cover custom board support package creation, security patch tracking, and long-term maintenance for embedded Linux products, work that is narrower than general firmware development but goes deeper into that one area than most generalist firms can. Lynx Software Technologies, a real-time operating system and safety-critical software vendor, acquired Timesys in 2023, folding its embedded Linux practice into a broader RTOS and hypervisor product line.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | Timesys |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bare-metal & driver development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Secure boot / OTA firmware updates | ✓ | ✓ |
| MCU & platform migration | ✓ | ✗ |
| Connectivity & IoT protocols | ✓ | ✗ |
| Functional safety / compliance | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded AI / on-device inference | ✓ | ✗ |
| Firmware GUI development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Hardware co-design / board bring-up | ✓ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | Timesys |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| Zephyr | ✓ | N/A |
| STM32 | ✓ | N/A |
| ARM Cortex-M | ✓ | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| MISRA | ✓ | N/A |
| Secure Boot | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | ✓ | N/A |
| RISC-V | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Timesys |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Firmware consulting, Design-phase engagement, Full development lifecycle, Staff augmentation | Support contracts, Consultation, Custom BSP development |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | Timesys |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging, OCPP), Transportation & Logistics (ISO 26262, IEC 61508) | Industrial, Networking, Consumer electronics |
| Best use cases | OCPP-compliant control firmware for an EV charging station rollout, Firmware code audit of a fielded product ahead of a security certification | Custom Yocto-based board support package for a new embedded Linux product, Long-term security patch tracking for a fielded embedded Linux device |
| Typical project type | Firmware consulting | Support contracts |
Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | Direct partner status with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip gives chip-level support most firmware vendors have to route through a distributor |
| + | In-house lab with oscilloscopes, evaluation kits, and HIL testing covers board bring-up work that many pure-software firms outsource |
| + | ISO 27001, ISO 9001, and ISO 13485 certifications plus MISRA-aware testing fit regulated medical and industrial clients |
| + | Embedded GUI capability across Qt, LVGL, and TouchGFX is broader than most competitors that only support one framework |
| + | Full IP and source code rights transfer to the client on every engagement |
| - | Does not run mass production in-house, so device manufacturing still requires a separate partner |
| - | Does not handle regulatory certification submissions on the client's behalf, only the supporting technical documentation |
| - | No published minimum engagement figure, so smaller teams need a scoping call before knowing if budget fits |
| Timesys | |
|---|---|
| + | Founding member of the Yocto Project, one of the two standard embedded Linux build systems in the industry |
| + | Three decades of operating history focused specifically on embedded Linux rather than firmware in general |
| + | Security patch tracking and long-term maintenance services address a gap most project-based firmware vendors don't cover after delivery |
| + | Acquisition by Lynx Software Technologies in 2023 connects its Linux practice to a broader RTOS and hypervisor product line |
| - | The 2023 acquisition by Lynx Software Technologies means Timesys now operates as part of a larger RTOS vendor rather than an independent consultancy |
| - | Its specialty is embedded Linux specifically, so RTOS-only or bare-metal MCU projects are a narrower fit than for a generalist firmware vendor |
| - | Public team size and pricing figures are not published |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: OCPP-compliant control firmware for an EV charging station rollout.
Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status combined with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging, OCPP), Transportation & Logistics (ISO 26262, IEC 61508), Manufacturing & Industrial IoT (IEC 62443), Consumer Electronics (FCC, CE/RED), Automotive (ISO 26262, ASPICE, ISO/SAE 21434).
Who should choose Timesys?
A typical fit: custom Yocto-based board support package for a new embedded Linux product.
Founding Yocto Project member with three decades of embedded Linux build-system and security-maintenance depth. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial, Networking, Consumer electronics, Automotive.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs Timesys (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Lemberg Solutions |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | Timesys fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| OCPP-compliant control firmware for an EV charging station rollout | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Firmware code audit of a fielded product ahead of a security certification | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Custom Yocto-based board support package for a new embedded Linux product | Limited | Strong | Timesys |
| Long-term security patch tracking for a fielded embedded Linux device | Limited | Strong | Timesys |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Firmware Development projects. Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status combined with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up.
Timesys (4.5/5) is worth a look if you need long-term security patch tracking for a fielded embedded Linux device. If your situation matches that, Timesys is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than Timesys?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: direct partner status with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip gives chip-level support most firmware vendors have to route through a distributor. Timesys's strongest advantage: founding member of the Yocto Project, one of the two standard embedded Linux build systems in the industry.
How do Lemberg Solutions and Timesys differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses firmware consulting, design-phase engagement, full development lifecycle, or staff augmentation pricing. Timesys uses support contracts, consultation, and custom development engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or Timesys?
Lemberg Solutions is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and Timesys?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status combined with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up. Timesys's primary differentiator is: founding Yocto Project member with three decades of embedded Linux build-system and security-maintenance depth. They also differ in team size (200+ vs Not published), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging, OCPP) vs Industrial, Networking).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.