Lemberg Solutions vs N-iX: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of N-iX (4.0/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for RTOS and secure-firmware projects needing chip-vendor partnerships. N-iX is the stronger option for enterprise programs needing firmware work alongside cloud, data, and AI services. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs N-iX: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | N-iX |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2002 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | Lviv, Ukraine (legal HQ Malta) |
| Team size | 200+ | 2,000+ |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status combined with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up | Enterprise-scale delivery capacity across 60-plus completed IoT and embedded projects inside a broader software engineering portfolio |
| Pricing model | Firmware consulting, design-phase engagement, full development lifecycle, or staff augmentation | Project-based and staff augmentation engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | MISRA C, FreeRTOS, Zephyr | C, C++, Embedded Linux |
| Industries served | Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging, OCPP), Transportation & Logistics (ISO 26262, IEC 61508), Manufacturing & Industrial IoT (IEC 62443), Consumer Electronics (FCC, CE/RED), Automotive (ISO 26262, ASPICE, ISO/SAE 21434) | Enterprise & Fortune 500, Manufacturing, Retail, Finance |
Lemberg Solutions vs N-iX: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Lemberg Solutions was founded in Lviv in 2007 and has grown to a 200+ person team with additional offices in Hamburg, London, and Kraków. Its firmware practice covers RTOS and bare-metal architecture on FreeRTOS, Zephyr, and Azure RTOS, secure boot and OTA update design, MCU and platform migration, and embedded GUI work in Qt, LVGL, and TouchGFX, backed by direct partnership status with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip. An in-house lab with oscilloscopes, evaluation kits, and hardware-in-the-loop testing lets the team validate board bring-up rather than outsource it. ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications, plus MISRA-aware testing, support regulated healthcare, automotive, and industrial clients, and the company transfers full IP and source code rights to the client on delivery.
N-iX
N-iX was founded in Lviv, Ukraine in 2002, growing out of work building product applications for Novell's Linux platform before Novell acquired that technology and the founding team stayed together as an independent firm. It now reports more than 2,000 engineers and a legal headquarters in Malta, delivering software engineering, cloud, AI, and data analytics services alongside more than 60 completed IoT and embedded projects covering firmware development, connected device engineering, and industrial IoT. That scale gives it delivery capacity few boutique firmware teams can match, though embedded and firmware work is one practice inside a much larger enterprise software portfolio rather than the firm's primary identity.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs N-iX
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | N-iX |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bare-metal & driver development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Secure boot / OTA firmware updates | ✓ | ✗ |
| MCU & platform migration | ✓ | ✗ |
| Connectivity & IoT protocols | ✓ | ✓ |
| Functional safety / compliance | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded AI / on-device inference | ✓ | ✓ |
| Firmware GUI development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Hardware co-design / board bring-up | ✓ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs N-iX
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | N-iX |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| Zephyr | ✓ | N/A |
| STM32 | ✓ | N/A |
| ARM Cortex-M | ✓ | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| MISRA | ✓ | N/A |
| Secure Boot | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | ✓ | N/A |
| RISC-V | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs N-iX
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | N-iX |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Firmware consulting, Design-phase engagement, Full development lifecycle, Staff augmentation | Project-based engineering, Staff augmentation, Dedicated teams |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs N-iX
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | N-iX |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging, OCPP), Transportation & Logistics (ISO 26262, IEC 61508) | Enterprise & Fortune 500, Manufacturing, Retail |
| Best use cases | OCPP-compliant control firmware for an EV charging station rollout, Firmware code audit of a fielded product ahead of a security certification | Firmware development as part of a broader enterprise IoT or connected-product program, Staff augmentation for an existing firmware team needing additional engineering capacity |
| Typical project type | Firmware consulting | Project-based engineering |
Lemberg Solutions vs N-iX: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | Direct partner status with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip gives chip-level support most firmware vendors have to route through a distributor |
| + | In-house lab with oscilloscopes, evaluation kits, and HIL testing covers board bring-up work that many pure-software firms outsource |
| + | ISO 27001, ISO 9001, and ISO 13485 certifications plus MISRA-aware testing fit regulated medical and industrial clients |
| + | Embedded GUI capability across Qt, LVGL, and TouchGFX is broader than most competitors that only support one framework |
| + | Full IP and source code rights transfer to the client on every engagement |
| - | Does not run mass production in-house, so device manufacturing still requires a separate partner |
| - | Does not handle regulatory certification submissions on the client's behalf, only the supporting technical documentation |
| - | No published minimum engagement figure, so smaller teams need a scoping call before knowing if budget fits |
| N-iX | |
|---|---|
| + | More than 2,000 engineers give it substantially more delivery capacity than boutique firmware consultancies |
| + | 60-plus completed IoT and embedded projects provide a verifiable volume of prior firmware delivery |
| + | Broader cloud, AI, and data analytics practice can support firmware projects that also need backend and analytics work |
| + | 23 years of operating history with Fortune 500 client relationships |
| - | Firmware and embedded work is one practice inside a much larger enterprise IT services portfolio, not the company's core identity |
| - | Legal headquarters in Malta versus its founding and delivery base in Lviv is a detail worth clarifying in a procurement conversation |
| - | No published pricing or minimum engagement figure |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: OCPP-compliant control firmware for an EV charging station rollout.
Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status combined with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging, OCPP), Transportation & Logistics (ISO 26262, IEC 61508), Manufacturing & Industrial IoT (IEC 62443), Consumer Electronics (FCC, CE/RED), Automotive (ISO 26262, ASPICE, ISO/SAE 21434).
Who should choose N-iX?
A typical fit: firmware development as part of a broader enterprise IoT or connected-product program.
Enterprise-scale delivery capacity across 60-plus completed IoT and embedded projects inside a broader software engineering portfolio. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Enterprise & Fortune 500, Manufacturing, Retail, Finance.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs N-iX
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | N-iX |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs N-iX (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Lemberg Solutions |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs N-iX
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | N-iX fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| OCPP-compliant control firmware for an EV charging station rollout | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Firmware code audit of a fielded product ahead of a security certification | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Firmware development as part of a broader enterprise IoT or connected-product program | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation for an existing firmware team needing additional engineering capacity | Limited | Strong | N-iX |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Strong | N-iX |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs N-iX
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Firmware Development projects. Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status combined with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up.
N-iX (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need staff augmentation for an existing firmware team needing additional engineering capacity. If your situation matches that, N-iX is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs N-iX FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than N-iX?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: direct partner status with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip gives chip-level support most firmware vendors have to route through a distributor. N-iX's strongest advantage: more than 2,000 engineers give it substantially more delivery capacity than boutique firmware consultancies.
How do Lemberg Solutions and N-iX differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses firmware consulting, design-phase engagement, full development lifecycle, or staff augmentation pricing. N-iX uses project-based and staff augmentation engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or N-iX?
N-iX is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and N-iX?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status combined with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up. N-iX's primary differentiator is: enterprise-scale delivery capacity across 60-plus completed IoT and embedded projects inside a broader software engineering portfolio. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 2,000+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging, OCPP) vs Enterprise & Fortune 500, Manufacturing).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.