Lemberg Solutions vs SNS Technosys: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of SNS Technosys (3.8/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for RTOS and secure-firmware projects needing chip-vendor partnerships. SNS Technosys is the stronger option for very small MCU and DSP firmware engagements on a limited budget. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs SNS Technosys: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | SNS Technosys |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2018 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | Pune, India |
| Team size | 200+ | 8 |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status combined with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up | Small, focused embedded product design practice covering both microcontroller and digital signal processor firmware |
| Pricing model | Firmware consulting, design-phase engagement, full development lifecycle, or staff augmentation | Project-based embedded product design engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | MISRA C, FreeRTOS, Zephyr | C, C++, Microcontroller Firmware |
| Industries served | Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging, OCPP), Transportation & Logistics (ISO 26262, IEC 61508), Manufacturing & Industrial IoT (IEC 62443), Consumer Electronics (FCC, CE/RED), Automotive (ISO 26262, ASPICE, ISO/SAE 21434) | Consumer electronics, Industrial products |
Lemberg Solutions vs SNS Technosys: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Lemberg Solutions was founded in Lviv in 2007 and has grown to a 200+ person team with additional offices in Hamburg, London, and Kraków. Its firmware practice covers RTOS and bare-metal architecture on FreeRTOS, Zephyr, and Azure RTOS, secure boot and OTA update design, MCU and platform migration, and embedded GUI work in Qt, LVGL, and TouchGFX, backed by direct partnership status with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip. An in-house lab with oscilloscopes, evaluation kits, and hardware-in-the-loop testing lets the team validate board bring-up rather than outsource it. ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications, plus MISRA-aware testing, support regulated healthcare, automotive, and industrial clients, and the company transfers full IP and source code rights to the client on delivery.
SNS Technosys
SNS Technosys LLP was established in Pune, Maharashtra, India in 2018 and reports a very small team of roughly 8 employees. The firm positions itself as a provider of engineering product design services in the embedded domain, developing custom embedded software for a range of microcontroller and digital signal processor platforms alongside product development and hardware design work. Its small scale limits it to a small number of concurrent client engagements, and public documentation of specific past projects is thin, so verifying its delivery track record in practice requires direct client references rather than published case studies.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs SNS Technosys
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | SNS Technosys |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bare-metal & driver development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Secure boot / OTA firmware updates | ✓ | ✗ |
| MCU & platform migration | ✓ | ✗ |
| Connectivity & IoT protocols | ✓ | ✗ |
| Functional safety / compliance | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded AI / on-device inference | ✓ | ✗ |
| Firmware GUI development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Hardware co-design / board bring-up | ✓ | ✓ |
| Staff augmentation | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs SNS Technosys
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | SNS Technosys |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| Zephyr | ✓ | N/A |
| STM32 | ✓ | N/A |
| ARM Cortex-M | ✓ | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| MISRA | ✓ | N/A |
| Secure Boot | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | ✓ | N/A |
| RISC-V | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs SNS Technosys
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | SNS Technosys |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Firmware consulting, Design-phase engagement, Full development lifecycle, Staff augmentation | Project-based embedded product design |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs SNS Technosys
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | SNS Technosys |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging, OCPP), Transportation & Logistics (ISO 26262, IEC 61508) | Consumer electronics, Industrial products |
| Best use cases | OCPP-compliant control firmware for an EV charging station rollout, Firmware code audit of a fielded product ahead of a security certification | Small microcontroller firmware project on a limited budget, Digital signal processor firmware development for a compact embedded product |
| Typical project type | Firmware consulting | Project-based embedded product design |
Lemberg Solutions vs SNS Technosys: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | Direct partner status with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip gives chip-level support most firmware vendors have to route through a distributor |
| + | In-house lab with oscilloscopes, evaluation kits, and HIL testing covers board bring-up work that many pure-software firms outsource |
| + | ISO 27001, ISO 9001, and ISO 13485 certifications plus MISRA-aware testing fit regulated medical and industrial clients |
| + | Embedded GUI capability across Qt, LVGL, and TouchGFX is broader than most competitors that only support one framework |
| + | Full IP and source code rights transfer to the client on every engagement |
| - | Does not run mass production in-house, so device manufacturing still requires a separate partner |
| - | Does not handle regulatory certification submissions on the client's behalf, only the supporting technical documentation |
| - | No published minimum engagement figure, so smaller teams need a scoping call before knowing if budget fits |
| SNS Technosys | |
|---|---|
| + | Covers both microcontroller and digital signal processor firmware, a combination not every small embedded firm offers |
| + | 7 years of operating history for a small, India-based embedded product design practice |
| + | Combined hardware design and firmware development suits a compact product needing both under one vendor |
| + | Small team size can mean lower overhead and more direct engineer access for a small-budget project |
| - | A team of roughly 8 people is among the smallest on this list, limiting capacity to a very small number of concurrent engagements |
| - | Public case studies and named client outcomes are limited, making the delivery track record harder to verify from public sources alone |
| - | No published pricing or minimum engagement figure |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: OCPP-compliant control firmware for an EV charging station rollout.
Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status combined with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging, OCPP), Transportation & Logistics (ISO 26262, IEC 61508), Manufacturing & Industrial IoT (IEC 62443), Consumer Electronics (FCC, CE/RED), Automotive (ISO 26262, ASPICE, ISO/SAE 21434).
Who should choose SNS Technosys?
A typical fit: small microcontroller firmware project on a limited budget.
Small, focused embedded product design practice covering both microcontroller and digital signal processor firmware. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer electronics, Industrial products.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs SNS Technosys
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs SNS Technosys (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Lemberg Solutions |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs SNS Technosys
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | SNS Technosys fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| OCPP-compliant control firmware for an EV charging station rollout | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Firmware code audit of a fielded product ahead of a security certification | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Small microcontroller firmware project on a limited budget | Limited | Strong | SNS Technosys |
| Digital signal processor firmware development for a compact embedded product | Limited | Strong | SNS Technosys |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs SNS Technosys
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Firmware Development projects. Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status combined with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up.
SNS Technosys (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need digital signal processor firmware development for a compact embedded product. If your situation matches that, SNS Technosys is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs SNS Technosys FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than SNS Technosys?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: direct partner status with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip gives chip-level support most firmware vendors have to route through a distributor. SNS Technosys's strongest advantage: covers both microcontroller and digital signal processor firmware, a combination not every small embedded firm offers.
How do Lemberg Solutions and SNS Technosys differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses firmware consulting, design-phase engagement, full development lifecycle, or staff augmentation pricing. SNS Technosys uses project-based embedded product design engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or SNS Technosys?
Lemberg Solutions is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and SNS Technosys?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status combined with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up. SNS Technosys's primary differentiator is: Small, focused embedded product design practice covering both microcontroller and digital signal processor firmware. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 8), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging, OCPP) vs Consumer electronics, Industrial products).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.