Lemberg Solutions vs USA Firmware: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of USA Firmware (4.2/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for RTOS and secure-firmware projects needing chip-vendor partnerships. USA Firmware is the stronger option for small to mid-size programs wanting one accountable firmware and FPGA partner. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs USA Firmware: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | USA Firmware |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2011 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | Brecksville, OH, USA |
| Team size | 200+ | 17 |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status combined with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up | Managed design services spanning electrical engineering, firmware, FPGA, and Linux under a single discovery-to-production process |
| Pricing model | Firmware consulting, design-phase engagement, full development lifecycle, or staff augmentation | Managed design service engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | MISRA C, FreeRTOS, Zephyr | C, C++, FPGA Design |
| Industries served | Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging, OCPP), Transportation & Logistics (ISO 26262, IEC 61508), Manufacturing & Industrial IoT (IEC 62443), Consumer Electronics (FCC, CE/RED), Automotive (ISO 26262, ASPICE, ISO/SAE 21434) | Industrial products, Commercial electronics |
Lemberg Solutions vs USA Firmware: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Lemberg Solutions was founded in Lviv in 2007 and has grown to a 200+ person team with additional offices in Hamburg, London, and Kraków. Its firmware practice covers RTOS and bare-metal architecture on FreeRTOS, Zephyr, and Azure RTOS, secure boot and OTA update design, MCU and platform migration, and embedded GUI work in Qt, LVGL, and TouchGFX, backed by direct partnership status with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip. An in-house lab with oscilloscopes, evaluation kits, and hardware-in-the-loop testing lets the team validate board bring-up rather than outsource it. ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications, plus MISRA-aware testing, support regulated healthcare, automotive, and industrial clients, and the company transfers full IP and source code rights to the client on delivery.
USA Firmware
USA Firmware was founded in 2011 by Bob Scaccia and operates from Brecksville, Ohio with a small team of around 17 people. Its managed design services combine electrical engineering, firmware, FPGA design, embedded software, and Linux expertise into a single discovery-through-production-enablement process, aimed at clients who want one accountable partner rather than coordinating separate electrical, firmware, and FPGA vendors. Leadership brings a stated 150-plus combined years of experience, concentrated in a small team rather than spread across a large organization.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs USA Firmware
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | USA Firmware |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bare-metal & driver development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Secure boot / OTA firmware updates | ✓ | ✗ |
| MCU & platform migration | ✓ | ✗ |
| Connectivity & IoT protocols | ✓ | ✗ |
| Functional safety / compliance | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded AI / on-device inference | ✓ | ✗ |
| Firmware GUI development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Hardware co-design / board bring-up | ✓ | ✓ |
| Staff augmentation | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs USA Firmware
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | USA Firmware |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| Zephyr | ✓ | N/A |
| STM32 | ✓ | N/A |
| ARM Cortex-M | ✓ | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| MISRA | ✓ | N/A |
| Secure Boot | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | ✓ | N/A |
| RISC-V | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs USA Firmware
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | USA Firmware |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Firmware consulting, Design-phase engagement, Full development lifecycle, Staff augmentation | Managed design services |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs USA Firmware
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | USA Firmware |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging, OCPP), Transportation & Logistics (ISO 26262, IEC 61508) | Industrial products, Commercial electronics |
| Best use cases | OCPP-compliant control firmware for an EV charging station rollout, Firmware code audit of a fielded product ahead of a security certification | Combined electrical, firmware, and FPGA design for a new industrial product, Firmware and Linux development requiring senior-level engineering attention on a smaller program |
| Typical project type | Firmware consulting | Managed design services |
Lemberg Solutions vs USA Firmware: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | Direct partner status with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip gives chip-level support most firmware vendors have to route through a distributor |
| + | In-house lab with oscilloscopes, evaluation kits, and HIL testing covers board bring-up work that many pure-software firms outsource |
| + | ISO 27001, ISO 9001, and ISO 13485 certifications plus MISRA-aware testing fit regulated medical and industrial clients |
| + | Embedded GUI capability across Qt, LVGL, and TouchGFX is broader than most competitors that only support one framework |
| + | Full IP and source code rights transfer to the client on every engagement |
| - | Does not run mass production in-house, so device manufacturing still requires a separate partner |
| - | Does not handle regulatory certification submissions on the client's behalf, only the supporting technical documentation |
| - | No published minimum engagement figure, so smaller teams need a scoping call before knowing if budget fits |
| USA Firmware | |
|---|---|
| + | Leadership brings a stated 150-plus combined years of experience concentrated in a small, senior team |
| + | Combines electrical engineering, firmware, and FPGA design under one managed process rather than three separate vendors |
| + | Discovery-through-production-enablement scope covers the full program, not just firmware coding |
| + | 14 years of operating history under its founder, Bob Scaccia |
| - | 17 employees is among the smallest teams on this list, limiting concurrent capacity for large programs |
| - | Public case study detail is limited, so verifying past client work requires direct outreach |
| - | No published pricing or minimum engagement figure |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: OCPP-compliant control firmware for an EV charging station rollout.
Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status combined with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging, OCPP), Transportation & Logistics (ISO 26262, IEC 61508), Manufacturing & Industrial IoT (IEC 62443), Consumer Electronics (FCC, CE/RED), Automotive (ISO 26262, ASPICE, ISO/SAE 21434).
Who should choose USA Firmware?
A typical fit: combined electrical, firmware, and FPGA design for a new industrial product.
Managed design services spanning electrical engineering, firmware, FPGA, and Linux under a single discovery-to-production process. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial products, Commercial electronics.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs USA Firmware
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs USA Firmware (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Lemberg Solutions |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs USA Firmware
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | USA Firmware fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| OCPP-compliant control firmware for an EV charging station rollout | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Firmware code audit of a fielded product ahead of a security certification | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Combined electrical, firmware, and FPGA design for a new industrial product | Limited | Strong | USA Firmware |
| Firmware and Linux development requiring senior-level engineering attention on a smaller program | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs USA Firmware
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Firmware Development projects. Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status combined with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up.
USA Firmware (4.2/5) is worth a look if you need firmware and Linux development requiring senior-level engineering attention on a smaller program. If your situation matches that, USA Firmware is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs USA Firmware FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than USA Firmware?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: direct partner status with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip gives chip-level support most firmware vendors have to route through a distributor. USA Firmware's strongest advantage: leadership brings a stated 150-plus combined years of experience concentrated in a small, senior team.
How do Lemberg Solutions and USA Firmware differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses firmware consulting, design-phase engagement, full development lifecycle, or staff augmentation pricing. USA Firmware uses managed design service engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or USA Firmware?
Lemberg Solutions is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and USA Firmware?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status combined with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up. USA Firmware's primary differentiator is: managed design services spanning electrical engineering, firmware, FPGA, and Linux under a single discovery-to-production process. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 17), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging, OCPP) vs Industrial products, Commercial electronics).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.